REGENERATIVE
BRAKE
A regenerative
brake is an energy recovery mechanism which slows down a vehicle or object
by converting its kinetic energy into another form, which can be either used
immediately or stored until needed. This contrasts with conventional braking
systems, where the excess kinetic energy is converted to heat by friction in
the brake linings and therefore wasted.
GENERAL:
The most
common form of regenerative brake involves using an electric motor as an
electric generator. In electric railways the generated electricity is fed back
into the supply system. In battery electric and hybrid electric vehicles, the
energy is stored chemically in a battery, electrically in a bank of capacitors,
or mechanically in a rotating flywheel. Hydraulic hybrid vehicles use hydraulic
motors to store energy in form of compressed air.
1.
Limitations:
Traditional
friction-based braking must be used in conjunction with mechanical regenerative
braking for the following reasons:
·
The regenerative braking
effect drops off at lower speeds; therefore the friction brake is still
required in order to bring the vehicle to a complete halt. Physical locking of
the rotor is also required to prevent vehicles from rolling down hills.
·
The friction brake is a
necessary back-up in the event of failure of the regenerative brake.
·
Most road vehicles with
regenerative braking only have power on some wheels (as in a two-wheel drive
car) and regenerative braking power only applies to such wheels because they
are the only wheels linked to the drive motor, so in order to provide controlled
braking under difficult conditions (such as in wet roads) friction based
braking is necessary on the other wheels.
·
The amount of electrical
energy capable of dissipation is limited by either the capacity of the supply
system to absorb this energy or on the state of charge of the battery or
capacitors. Effective regenerative braking can only occur if the battery or
capacitors are not fully charged. For this reason, it is normal to also
incorporate dynamic braking to absorb the excess energy.
·
Under
emergency braking it is desirable that the braking force exerted be the maximum
allowed by the friction between the wheels and the surface without slipping,
over the entire speed range from the vehicle's maximum speed down to zero. The
maximum force available for acceleration is typically much less than this
except in the case of extreme high-performance vehicles. Therefore, the power
required to be dissipated by the braking system under emergency braking
conditions may be many times the maximum power which is delivered under
acceleration. Traction motors sized to handle the drive power may not be able
to cope with the extra load and the battery may not be able to accept charge at
a sufficiently high rate. Friction braking is required to dissipate the surplus
energy in order to allow an acceptable emergency braking performance.
For
these reasons there is typically the need to control the regenerative braking
and match the friction and regenerative braking to produce the desired total
braking effect. The GM EV-1 was the first commercial car to do this. Engineers
Abraham Farag and Loren Majersik were issued two patents for this brake-by-wire
technology.
Additionally,
early applications commonly suffered from a serious safety hazard. In many
early electric vehicles with regenerative braking, the same controller
positions were used to apply power and to apply the regenerative brake, with
the functions being swapped by a separate switch. This led to a number of
serious accidents when drivers accidentally accelerated when intending to
brake, such as the runaway train accident in Wädenswil, Switzerland in 1948,
which killed twenty-one people.
CONVERSION
TO ELECTRIC ENERGY: THE MOTOR AS GENERATOR
Vehicles
driven by electric motors use the motor as a generator when using regenerative
braking: it is operated as a generator during braking and its output is
supplied to an electrical load; the transfer of energy to the load provides the
braking effect.
Regenerative
braking is used on hybrid gas/electric automobiles to recoup some of the energy
lost during stopping. This energy is saved in a storage battery and used later
to power the motor whenever the car is in electric mode.
Early
examples of this system were the front-wheel drive conversions of horse-drawn
cabs by Louis Antoine Krieger (1868–1951). The Krieger electric landaulet had a
drive motor in each front wheel with a second set of parallel windings (bifilar
coil) for regenerative braking. In England, the Raworth system of "regenerative
control" was introduced by tramway operators in the early 1900s, since it
offered them economic and operational benefits as explained by A. Raworth of
Leeds in some detail. These included tramway
systems at Devonport (1903), Rawtenstall, Birmingham, Crystal Palace-Croydon
(1906), and many others. Slowing down the speed of the cars or keeping it in
hand on descending gradients, the motors worked as generators and braked the
vehicles. The tram cars also had wheel brakes and track slipper brakes which
could stop the tram should the electric braking systems fail. In several cases
the tram car motors were shunt wound instead of series wound, and the systems
on the Crystal Palace line utilized series-parallel controllers. Following a
serious accident at Rawtenstall, an embargo was placed on this form of traction
in 1911. Twenty years later, the regenerative braking system was reintroduced.
Regenerative
braking has been in extensive use on railways for many decades. The
Baku-Tbilisi-Batumi railway (Transcaucasus Railway or Georgian railway) started
utilizing regenerative braking in the early 1930s. This was especially
effective on the steep and dangerous Surami Pass. In Scandinavia the Kiruna to
Narvik railway carries iron ore from the mines in Kiruna in the north of Sweden
down to the port of Narvik in Norway to this day. The rail cars are full of
thousands of tons of iron ore on the way down to Narvik, and these trains
generate large amounts of electricity by their regenerative braking. From
Riksgränsen on the national border to the Port of Narvik, the trains use only a
fifth of the power they regenerate. The regenerated energy is sufficient to
power the empty trains back up to the national border. Any excess energy from
the railway is pumped into the power grid to supply homes and businesses in the
region, and the railway is a net generator of electricity
The
Energy Regeneration Brake was developed in 1967 for the AMC Amitron. This was a completely
battery powered urban concept car whose batteries were recharged by
regenerative braking, thus increasing the range of the automobile.
Many
modern hybrid and electric vehicles use this technique to extend the range of
the battery pack. The regenerative braking in vehicles became a feature, with
emergence of AC drive train technology, developed by Miro Zoric. Examples
include the General Motors EV1, Toyota Prius, Honda Insight, the Vectrix
electric maxi-scooter, the Tesla Roadster, the Tesla Model S, the Nissan Leaf,
the Mahindra Reva, the Chevrolet Volt, the Fiat 500e, and the Ford C-Max.
1. Electric Railway Vehicle Operation
In
1886, the Sprague Electric Railway & Motor Company, founded by Frank J.
Sprague, introduced two important inventions: a constant-speed, non-sparking
motor with fixed brushes, and regenerative braking, the method braking that
uses the drive motor to return power to the main supply system.
During braking, the traction
motor connections are altered to turn them into electrical generators. The
motor fields are connected across the main traction generator (MG) and the
motor armatures are connected across the load. The MG now excites the motor
fields. The rolling locomotive or multiple unit wheels turn the motor
armatures, and the motors act as generators, either sending the generated
current through onboard resistors (dynamic braking) or back into the supply
(regenerative braking). Compared to electro-pneumatic friction brakes, braking
with the traction motors can be regulated faster improving the performance of
wheel slide protection.For a given direction of travel, current flow through the motor armatures during braking will be opposite to that during motoring. Therefore, the motor exerts torque in a direction that is opposite from the rolling direction.
Braking effort is proportional to the product of the magnetic strength of the field windings, multiplied by that of the armature windings.
Savings of 17% are claimed for Virgin Trains Pendolinos. There is also less wear on friction braking components. The Delhi Metro saved around 90,000 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) from being released into the atmosphere by regenerating 112,500 megawatt hours of electricity through the use of regenerative braking systems between 2004 and 2007. It is expected that the Delhi Metro will save over 100,000 tons of CO 2 from being emitted per year once its phase II is complete through the use of regenerative braking
Another form of regenerative braking is used on some parts of the London Underground, which is achieved by having small slopes leading up and down from stations. The train is slowed by the climb, and then leaves down a slope, so kinetic energy is converted to gravitational potential energy in the station. This is normally found on the deep tunnel sections of the network and not generally above ground or on the cut and cover sections of the Metropolitan and District Lines.
Electricity generated by regenerative braking may be fed back into the traction power supply; either offset against other electrical demand on the network at that instant, used for head end power loads, or stored in lineside storage systems for later use.
2. Comparison of dynamic and regenerative brakes
Dynamic
brakes ("rheostatic brakes" in the UK), unlike regenerative brakes,
dissipate the electric energy as heat by passing the current through large
banks of variable resistors. Vehicles that use dynamic brakes include
forklifts, diesel-electric locomotives, and streetcars. This heat can be used
to warm the vehicle interior, or dissipated externally by large radiator-like
cowls to house the resistor banks.
The
main disadvantage of regenerative brakes when compared with dynamic brakes is
the need to closely match the generated current with the supply characteristics
and increased maintenance cost of the lines. With DC supplies, this requires
that the voltage be closely controlled. The AC power supply and frequency
converter pioneer Miro Zoric and his first AC power electronics have also
enabled this to be possible with AC supplies. The supply frequency must also be
matched (this mainly applies to locomotives where an AC supply is rectified for
DC motors).
In
areas where there exists a constant need for power unrelated to moving the
vehicle such as electric train heat or air conditioning, this load requirement
can be utilized as a sink for the recovered energy via modern AC traction
systems. This method has become popular with North American passenger railroads
where Head End Power loads are typically in the area of 500 kW year round.
Using HEP loads in this way has prompted recent electric locomotive designs
such as the ALP-46 and ACS-64 to eliminate the use of dynamic brake resistor
grids and also eliminates any need for any external power infrastructure to
accommodate power recovery allowing self-powered vehicles to employ
regenerative braking as well.
A
small number of steep grade railways have used 3-phase power supplies and
3-phase induction motors. This results in a near constant speed for all trains
as the motors rotate with the supply frequency both when motoring and braking.
CONVERSION
TO MECHANICAL ENERGY:
1. Kinetic energy recovery systems
Kinetic
energy recovery systems (KERS) were used for the motor sport Formula One's 2009
season, and are under development for road vehicles. KERS was abandoned for the
2010 Formula One season, but re-introduced for the 2011 season. By 2013, all
teams were using KERS with Marussia starting use for the 2013 season. One of
the main reasons that not all cars used KERS immediately is because it raises
the car's center of gravity, and reduces the amount of ballast that is
available to balance the car so that it is more predictable when turning. FIA
rules also limit the exploitation of the system. The concept of transferring
the vehicle’s kinetic energy using flywheel energy storage was postulated by
physicist Richard Feynman in the 1950s and is exemplified in such systems as
the Zytek, Flybrid, Torotrak and Xtrac
used in F1. Differential based systems also exist such as the Cambridge
Passenger/Commercial Vehicle Kinetic Energy Recovery System (CPC-KERS).
Xtrac
and Flybrid are both licensees of Torotrak's technologies, which employ a small
and sophisticated ancillary gearbox incorporating a continuously variable
transmission (CVT). The CPC-KERS is similar as it also forms part of the
driveline assembly. However, the whole mechanism including the flywheel sits
entirely in the vehicle’s hub (looking like a drum brake). In the CPC-KERS, a
differential replaces the CVT and transfers torque between the flywheel, drive
wheel and road wheel.
1.1
Use in
Motor Sport
1.1.1
History
The
first of these systems to be revealed was the Flybrid. This system weighs
24 kg and has an energy capacity of 400 kJ after allowing for internal
losses. A maximum power boost of 60 kW (81.6 PS, 80.4 HP) for 6.67 seconds
is available. The 240 mm diameter flywheel weighs 5.0 kg and revolves
at up to 64,500 rpm. Maximum torque is 18 Nm (13.3 ftlbs). The system
occupies a volume of 13 litres.
Two
minor incidents have been reported during testing of KERS systems in 2008. The
first occurred when the Red Bull Racing team tested their KERS battery for the
first time in July: it malfunctioned and caused a fire scare that led to the
team's factory being evacuated. The second was less than a week later when a
BMW Sauber mechanic was given an electric shock when he touched Christian
Klien's KERS-equipped car during a test at the Jerez circuit.
1.1.2
FIA
Formula
One have stated that they support responsible solutions to the world's
environmental challenges, and the FIA allowed the use of 81 hp (60 kW;
82 PS) KERS in the regulations for the 2009 Formula One season. Teams
began testing systems in 2008: energy can either be stored as mechanical energy
(as in a flywheel) or as electrical energy (as in a battery or supercapacitor).
With
the introduction of KERS in the 2009 season, only four teams used it at some
point in the season: Ferrari, Renault, BMW, and McLaren. Eventually, during the
season, Renault and BMW stopped using the system. Vodafone McLaren Mercedes
became the first team to win a F1 GP using a KERS equipped car when Lewis
Hamilton won the Hungarian Grand Prix on 26 July 2009. Their second KERS
equipped car finished fifth. At the following race, Lewis Hamilton became the
first driver to take pole position with a KERS car, his team mate, Heikki
Kovalainen qualifying second. This was also the first instance of an all KERS
front row. On 30 August 2009, Kimi Räikkönen won the Belgian Grand Prix with
his KERS equipped Ferrari. It was the first time that KERS contributed directly
to a race victory, with second placed Giancarlo Fisichella claiming
"Actually, I was quicker than Kimi. He only took me because of KERS at the
beginning".
Although
KERS was still legal in F1 in the 2010 season, all the teams had agreed not to
use it. New
rules for the 2011 F1 season which raised the minimum weight limit of the car
and driver by 20 kg to 640 kg, along
with the FOTA teams agreeing to the use of KERS devices once more, meant that
KERS returned for the 2011 season. This is still optional as it was in the 2009
season; in the 2011 season 3 teams elected not to use it. For the 2012 season,
only Marussia and HRT raced without KERS, and by 2013, with the withdrawal of
HRT, all 11 teams on the grid were running KERS.
For
the 2014 season, the power storage of the KERS (now called MGU-K) units
increased from 60 kW to 120 kW. This was to balance the sport's move
from 2.4 litre V8 engines to 1.6 litre V6 engines. The fail-safe settings of
the brake-by-wire system that now supplements KERS came under examination as a
contributing factor in the crash of Jules Bianchi at the 2014 Japanese Grand
Prix.
1.1.3
Autopart
Makers
Bosch
Motorsport Service is developing a KERS for use in motor racing. These
electricity storage systems for hybrid and engine functions include a
lithium-ion battery with scalable capacity or a flywheel, a four to eight
kilogram electric motor (with a maximum power level of 60 kW or
80 hp), as well as the KERS controller for power and battery management.
Bosch also offers a range of electric hybrid systems for commercial and
light-duty applications.
1.1.4
Carmakers
Automakers including Honda have been testing KERS systems. At the
2008 1,000 km of Silverstone, Peugeot Sport unveiled the Peugeot 908 HY, a
hybrid electric variant of the diesel 908, with KERS. Peugeot planned to
campaign the car in the 2009 Le Mans Series season, although it was not capable
of scoring championship points. Peugeot plans also a compressed air regenerative
braking powertrain called Hybrid Air.
Vodafone McLaren Mercedes began testing of their KERS in September
2008 at the Jerez test track in preparation for the 2009 F1 season, although at
that time it was not yet known if they would be operating an electrical or
mechanical system. In November 2008 it was announced that Freescale
Semiconductor would collaborate with McLaren Electronic Systems to further
develop its KERS for McLaren's Formula One car from 2010 onwards. Both parties
believed this collaboration would improve McLaren's KERS system and help the
system filter down to road car technology.
Toyota has used a supercapacitor for
regeneration on Supra HV-Rhybrid race car that won the 24 Hours of Tokachi race in July 2007.
1.1.5 Motorcycles
KTM
racing boss Harald Bartol has revealed that the factory raced with a secret
kinetic energy recovery system (KERS) fitted to Tommy Koyama's motorcycle
during the 2008 season-ending 125cc Valencian Grand Prix. This was against the
rules, so they were banned from doing it afterwards.
1.2
Bicycles
Regenerative
braking is also possible on a non-electric bicycle. The EPA, working with
students from the University of Michigan, developed the hydraulic Regenerative
Brake Launch Assist (RBLA).
1.3
Races
Automobile
Club de l'Ouest, the organizer behind the annual 24 Hours of Le Mans event and
the Le Mans Series is currently "studying specific rules for LMP1 that
will be equipped with a kinetic energy recovery system." Peugeot was the first
manufacturer to unveil a fully functioning LMP1 car in the form of the 908 HY
at the 2008 Autosport 1000 km race at Silverstone.
Comments
Post a Comment